Honestly, yeah. Just stop sending aid to all nonwhite countries and just watch them implode. This is like le bad for muh economy or something so it probably will never ever ever happen under this system. Perhaps something for Barron to consider? Anyways. Double the child tax credits for any family with two parents over 100 IQ, and provide them a UBI of $10,000 annually if they are over 115 IQ. This probably will also never ever ever happen under our system because of the gazillions of dysgenic mutts that infest every level of our government like a plague of locusts or perhaps even rats.
Positive Eugenics (i.e. only using reward incentives for good genes and not using negative incentives for bad genes) has a possibility of appealing to a great deal of people and won't result in that much moral browbeating. "Erm it's bad that the gov't will just give you money for existing because... erm.. I won't get any of it, you fucking chud!" Just drop a nuke on the welfare system and funnel all that money into positive eugenics programs. Make everyone get a regular free IQ test kind of similar to how you need to take a driver's test every time your license expires or something. Call it like the 'Increase Intelligence Incentive' and advertize it in blue cities as like a thing that will only hurt rural MAGAturd hicks and give them their freaking equitable socialism they want so bad.
I mostly agree. The only difference is that when we start the Hyperborean Space Empire we will need to start breeding like rabbits because it's gon be crazy
I understand where you're coming from with eugenics, but those at the helm right now are mostly evil bastards and we don't want them operating a eugenics program. There's a running theory based on the Mouse Utopia experiment that mental illness and social stress have become the greatest drivers of depopulation. The idea being that those under tremendous social stress effectively become infertile and seek the destruction of their own civilization. Something that can be clearly observed with the behavior of the modern Woke progressive: highly destructive, childless, bitter.
Realistically we're watching major population declines in real-time and that will lead to a bifurcation in humanity. Effectively the midwit population is going to be cut out leaving only Brights who hold procreation as a form of social duty and dimwits who are too thick to use birth control. Those in the middle are too subject to major social stressors to function. I believe the Elite see this too and are attempting to form a caste-based society with a serf-class and a regal-class and no one in between. They look at it economically however, rather than genealogically.
Regarding race, I think we should be considering ethnogenisis rather than attempting to preserve historic ethnicities. We're in an era of civilization that is similar to the birth of the germanic tribes that later became Bavarains, Germans, and French. Over-focusing on race at this stage will hamstring the way future civilizations will develop... Social Darwinian forces will take care of the racial components as the United States and other western nations destabilize all by themselves.
By having a 2 or 3 kids you can radically outpace the average and be well over-represented in the next generation right now. Life is very hard... but rarely in human history has it been easier to create a bloodline that'll persist for numerous future generations.
Spot on. Phenomes are tricky anyway. I married a Tejano woman whose father is old Spanish Trail blood and she gave me a white boy with green eyes and blonde hair, even though she's dark skin and chocolate eyes.
Nietzsche did say look not to the fatherland, but the kinderland!
Yeah, I used to worry about the decreasing population, but there’s nothing wrong with a smaller population. The problem is we keep importing the third world and giving them aid which is a modern version of the White Man’s Burden which was and is a cancer upon European man and his descendants/outposts. Good article.
>This is obviously complicated as many countries wouldn't take much of a liking to outsiders trying to decrease their birthrates. However it's certainly not impossible.
In the 1970s under Robert McNamara the World Bank made access to development loans for third world countries conditional on them implementing policy to reduce their fertility rates. This was an extremely successful policy. Latin America, India, China, Iran and Turkey went from a TFR of 7 in the 1970s to below replacement today.
This is a top Kek article that would never be written today.
"Picture yourself applying for a loan at the bank. You need some extra cash for a development project — like kitchen remodeling, plumbing repair, or a second family car.
“How many children do you have?” asks the bank official. “And how many more do you intend to have?”
You protest that it is none of his business, but he shows you an official bank policy statement indicating that population is a major concern of the board of directors.
It’s a development loan you want, after all. And the bank has every right to know how you intend to develop your house – including the number of people who might be living there and eating there in the future. Money spent on diaper services is money that obviously won’t be available to service the household debt. Besides, the bank is financed by investors who themselves have the good sense to limit their fertility, as the loan officer explains. “You, too, must therefore act responsibly.”
Well, you absolutely must have the money. The roof is leaking and the front steps are falling off of the house. So you submit the required “development plan,” which includes a special policy to check population growth. In other words, you agree to make sure that your kids — some of them, anyway — get sterilized. The procedure will be financed by the bank, of course, but you’ll pay the money back with interest.
Welcome to the World Bank.
The World Bank deals with governments, not families — at least not directly. But it labors relentlessly to make sure that the size and constituency of every family becomes a concern of borrowing country governments."
brownoids unfortunately will have so many kids and are booming, that's the perfect recipe for our replacement. What we ought to do in White countries is stop letting other people in and cut funding to other countries, invest in ourselves and build a better and brighter future for our kids so we'll be able to have them. We cannot afford to go down the current path. We need to depopulate africa, not Europe and America.
> "Birthrate collapse is overwhelmingly caused by forces well beyond our control"
There was a really great article I read by a demographer (but g*d-f***ing-d***it I have not been able to find again) which went through a bunch of statistical, compared a bunch of different factors, discredited various "overwhelming forces", and found that "how many kids people had" tended to correlate more with "how many kids people wanted", more than it correlated with any other factor.
If he's right, then any & all methods that work to change a society's other opinions could be used to change the fertility rate.
I presume all the people who wrote those "save the environment by not having kids" articles are counting on this too.
Mass, Connecticut, and Rhode Island are already full of third worlders. Many towns in Eastern Mass are different countries all together.
This is a problem because Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire are basically satellite territories of Massachusetts. All three states cultures and policies are essentially controlled by Massholes moving there. I’d like to be wrong, but they’re already trying to dump Somalians into Portland, Maine. The whites who live here are always crying about needing more diversity. Only a matter of time before they ruin it.
Every little conspiracy or inconvenience, from vax, wokeness, etc is almost like they're selectively picking people who do value life and have enough IQ (or perhaps gut instinct) to avoid modern poisons.
Got vaxxed? Probably screwed up your genetic code in the long run if not cause other problems permanently.
Woke? No kids? Good, breed that mind state out of existence.
It's already underway and I feel like only the fervent will remain.
Population of Earth before World War II: 1.75 Billion
Population of Earth now: 8 Billion
Population of USA before World War II: 92 million
Population of USA now: 345 million.
Population of Japan before WWII: 50 Million
Population of Japan now: 124 million
The point is that people managed to have two World Wars with less than half of the people we have now. If 2 out of 3 people vanished into thin air in the USA they would still have more people than before the World Wars.
"Oh noooo all the heckin' old people in Japan are gonna die and they'll run out of people!"
Half of Japan could drop dead and they'd still have enough people to power World War II.
Apart from Africa and the Middle East, numbers are already balancing out.Also, hardly any of the groups in problematic numbers can sustaine their level of societal complexity. Take away all the White support on every level and the problem disappears within a generation.
CRISPR is evil faggotry in the tradition of transhumanist globalists. WEF Klaus Schwaband his gay-married Asian husband butt-fuck to this transhumanist porn.
Granted, you are young, dumb, and full of rage, but give it time for greater ideas to take hold. For me, a permanent state of low-grade hand-to-hand warfare is an excellent way to perfect man in the image of Apollo. A future America that reintroduces clans, tribes, and nations would be glorious. I want to see tribes owning and distributong land and only blood purchases land expansion.
Why are we here? To perfect our soul in the crucible of struggle and to reincarnate into our tribe until we get it right. With this simple maxim, the patrons and wealthy of your tribe are likely to use their wealth to create a better city-state for them to reincarnate to. The children of your society are loved and provided for better than any other known society - as these children are us and our grandparents.
Honestly, yeah. Just stop sending aid to all nonwhite countries and just watch them implode. This is like le bad for muh economy or something so it probably will never ever ever happen under this system. Perhaps something for Barron to consider? Anyways. Double the child tax credits for any family with two parents over 100 IQ, and provide them a UBI of $10,000 annually if they are over 115 IQ. This probably will also never ever ever happen under our system because of the gazillions of dysgenic mutts that infest every level of our government like a plague of locusts or perhaps even rats.
Positive Eugenics (i.e. only using reward incentives for good genes and not using negative incentives for bad genes) has a possibility of appealing to a great deal of people and won't result in that much moral browbeating. "Erm it's bad that the gov't will just give you money for existing because... erm.. I won't get any of it, you fucking chud!" Just drop a nuke on the welfare system and funnel all that money into positive eugenics programs. Make everyone get a regular free IQ test kind of similar to how you need to take a driver's test every time your license expires or something. Call it like the 'Increase Intelligence Incentive' and advertize it in blue cities as like a thing that will only hurt rural MAGAturd hicks and give them their freaking equitable socialism they want so bad.
Aid will stop as global industrialism starts to grind down into a new form of scarcity-industrialism.
I mostly agree. The only difference is that when we start the Hyperborean Space Empire we will need to start breeding like rabbits because it's gon be crazy
Very true, but that will probably be a while.
I understand where you're coming from with eugenics, but those at the helm right now are mostly evil bastards and we don't want them operating a eugenics program. There's a running theory based on the Mouse Utopia experiment that mental illness and social stress have become the greatest drivers of depopulation. The idea being that those under tremendous social stress effectively become infertile and seek the destruction of their own civilization. Something that can be clearly observed with the behavior of the modern Woke progressive: highly destructive, childless, bitter.
Realistically we're watching major population declines in real-time and that will lead to a bifurcation in humanity. Effectively the midwit population is going to be cut out leaving only Brights who hold procreation as a form of social duty and dimwits who are too thick to use birth control. Those in the middle are too subject to major social stressors to function. I believe the Elite see this too and are attempting to form a caste-based society with a serf-class and a regal-class and no one in between. They look at it economically however, rather than genealogically.
Regarding race, I think we should be considering ethnogenisis rather than attempting to preserve historic ethnicities. We're in an era of civilization that is similar to the birth of the germanic tribes that later became Bavarains, Germans, and French. Over-focusing on race at this stage will hamstring the way future civilizations will develop... Social Darwinian forces will take care of the racial components as the United States and other western nations destabilize all by themselves.
By having a 2 or 3 kids you can radically outpace the average and be well over-represented in the next generation right now. Life is very hard... but rarely in human history has it been easier to create a bloodline that'll persist for numerous future generations.
Article on creating a new Ethnos if you're interested: https://alwaysthehorizon.substack.com/p/post-faustian-ethnos-identity-and
I'd like your opinion on the topic.
Spot on. Phenomes are tricky anyway. I married a Tejano woman whose father is old Spanish Trail blood and she gave me a white boy with green eyes and blonde hair, even though she's dark skin and chocolate eyes.
Nietzsche did say look not to the fatherland, but the kinderland!
Interesting you rediscover this comment after 6 months. Hello!
Yeah, I used to worry about the decreasing population, but there’s nothing wrong with a smaller population. The problem is we keep importing the third world and giving them aid which is a modern version of the White Man’s Burden which was and is a cancer upon European man and his descendants/outposts. Good article.
That’s true, that’s why many companies support importing cheap labor from the third world.
>This is obviously complicated as many countries wouldn't take much of a liking to outsiders trying to decrease their birthrates. However it's certainly not impossible.
In the 1970s under Robert McNamara the World Bank made access to development loans for third world countries conditional on them implementing policy to reduce their fertility rates. This was an extremely successful policy. Latin America, India, China, Iran and Turkey went from a TFR of 7 in the 1970s to below replacement today.
This is a top Kek article that would never be written today.
"Picture yourself applying for a loan at the bank. You need some extra cash for a development project — like kitchen remodeling, plumbing repair, or a second family car.
“How many children do you have?” asks the bank official. “And how many more do you intend to have?”
You protest that it is none of his business, but he shows you an official bank policy statement indicating that population is a major concern of the board of directors.
It’s a development loan you want, after all. And the bank has every right to know how you intend to develop your house – including the number of people who might be living there and eating there in the future. Money spent on diaper services is money that obviously won’t be available to service the household debt. Besides, the bank is financed by investors who themselves have the good sense to limit their fertility, as the loan officer explains. “You, too, must therefore act responsibly.”
Well, you absolutely must have the money. The roof is leaking and the front steps are falling off of the house. So you submit the required “development plan,” which includes a special policy to check population growth. In other words, you agree to make sure that your kids — some of them, anyway — get sterilized. The procedure will be financed by the bank, of course, but you’ll pay the money back with interest.
Welcome to the World Bank.
The World Bank deals with governments, not families — at least not directly. But it labors relentlessly to make sure that the size and constituency of every family becomes a concern of borrowing country governments."
https://www.pop.org/world-bank-population-policy-remote-control/
brownoids unfortunately will have so many kids and are booming, that's the perfect recipe for our replacement. What we ought to do in White countries is stop letting other people in and cut funding to other countries, invest in ourselves and build a better and brighter future for our kids so we'll be able to have them. We cannot afford to go down the current path. We need to depopulate africa, not Europe and America.
Just as it is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep it's better to have 1 life of a lion than 100 lives od sheep. #boom
> "Birthrate collapse is overwhelmingly caused by forces well beyond our control"
There was a really great article I read by a demographer (but g*d-f***ing-d***it I have not been able to find again) which went through a bunch of statistical, compared a bunch of different factors, discredited various "overwhelming forces", and found that "how many kids people had" tended to correlate more with "how many kids people wanted", more than it correlated with any other factor.
If he's right, then any & all methods that work to change a society's other opinions could be used to change the fertility rate.
I presume all the people who wrote those "save the environment by not having kids" articles are counting on this too.
They’re coming for New England.
Mass, Connecticut, and Rhode Island are already full of third worlders. Many towns in Eastern Mass are different countries all together.
This is a problem because Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire are basically satellite territories of Massachusetts. All three states cultures and policies are essentially controlled by Massholes moving there. I’d like to be wrong, but they’re already trying to dump Somalians into Portland, Maine. The whites who live here are always crying about needing more diversity. Only a matter of time before they ruin it.
The eugenics is already under way.
Survival of the Wisest by Saulk.
Every little conspiracy or inconvenience, from vax, wokeness, etc is almost like they're selectively picking people who do value life and have enough IQ (or perhaps gut instinct) to avoid modern poisons.
Got vaxxed? Probably screwed up your genetic code in the long run if not cause other problems permanently.
Woke? No kids? Good, breed that mind state out of existence.
It's already underway and I feel like only the fervent will remain.
Part XI — Western Population Control Timeline (1970s–2030s)
1970s — Foundation Phase (Soft Eugenics 1.0)
Legal abortion + contraception normalization → fertility collapse below replacement.
No-fault divorce laws → household stability eroded, single-parent households proliferate.
Feminist labor integration → women delayed fertility by prioritizing careers and higher education.
Overpopulation narrative peaks (Club of Rome, Paul Ehrlich): the problem was openly named.
Student loan expansion → adolescence extended, family formation delayed.
Effect: fertility in the West fell below replacement, establishing the first deliberate bottleneck. Overpopulation was acknowledged as the driver.
1980s–1990s — Narrative Pivot & Cultural Filters
Shift from “overpopulation” to “climate” (cooling → warming → “change”) → demographic discussion reframed into environmental terms.
Mass incarceration (U.S.) → millions of low-agency, low-IQ males removed from reproductive pools.
Two-income norm & consumerism → household costs rose, fertility further suppressed.
Housing finance deregulation & speculation → rising costs locked younger families out.
Effect: fertility suppression continued, but justification moved under moralized “environmental” and economic frames.
2000s — Soft Eugenics 2.0
LGBTQ normalization & expansion → widening of non-reproductive identity sets.
SSRIs, opioids, pharmaceuticals → sedation of low-agency populations, libido suppression.
No-fault divorce fully normalized → fragmentation entrenched.
Climate narrative hardens (“global warming”) → unfalsifiable justification for rationing policies.
Effect: fertility bottlenecks widened, sterile lifestyles normalized, chemical pacification expanded.
2010s — Pacification Intensifies
Cannabis legalization + opioid flood → sedation and selective mortality.
Safe injection sites → mortality channels for the lowest strata, framed as compassion.
Gender identity expansion → fertility further suppressed via social engineering.
Climate reframed as “change” → universal and unfalsifiable narrative anchor.
Effect: fertility collapse accelerated; demographic pruning reframed as progress.
2020s — Exit Channels & Compliance Test
Euthanasia/MAiD expansion → normalized old-age exits.
Housing & inflation policy → deliberate bottlenecks to family formation.
Covid lockdowns → obedience stress-test; rationing logic normalized.
Net Zero climate policy → explicit rationing framework enters policy.
Effect: fertility across the West drops to historic lows (TFR <1.4). Rationing logic accepted. Exit channels (euthanasia, sedation, abortion) openly normalized.
2030s — Physics Choke & Mask Slip
Net-energy and fertilizer decline (2028–2032) → food/fuel choke undeniable.
Rationing becomes structural → fairness cards, quotas, digital allocations.
Export leverage → food and energy weaponized geopolitically.
Kinetic mouth reduction → wars, blockades, famines selectively reduce low-foresight populations.
Domestic narrative: “Climate equity / planetary survival.”
Forecast Phase VII — Hard Biopolitics (2040s+)
Embryo Screening & Selection → fertility technologically filtered.
Gene Editing & Digital Fertility Licenses → reproduction linked to cognitive & compliance thresholds.
Global South Depopulation by Neglect/Conflict → remaining periphery populations thinned under food wars.
Fortress Core Strategy → high-FSIQ blocs (West, East Asia) wall themselves off, sustaining reduced populations with controlled high-tech systems.
Result: The soft eugenics era gives way to explicit technocratic eugenics — survival of civilization by deliberate pruning.
1. Overpopulation to Climate Pivot
Club of Rome – Limits to Growth (1972)
Straightforward systems model: overshoot, collapse, population as central stressor.
UN Population Conferences (1974 Bucharest, 1984 Mexico City, 1994 Cairo)
Shifted rhetoric from “population control” → “reproductive rights.”
IPCC 1st Assessment Report (1990)
Climate framing becomes the replacement narrative for “too many mouths.”
2. Legal & Cultural Fertility Suppression
U.S. No-Fault Divorce Acts (California 1969 → all states by 1985)
Demographic collapse through household fragmentation.
Roe v. Wade (1973) and abortion legalization in Western Europe.
OECD Education Data (1970s–1990s) — showing sharp rise in female tertiary education, correlated directly to fertility decline.
3. Debt & Scarcity Tools
IMF Structural Adjustment Programs (1980s–2000s)
Loans in exchange for austerity — reduced food subsidies, health care → higher mortality.
OECD Housing Affordability Reports — confirm deliberate structural scarcity in West.
4. Pacification & Exit Pathways
Harm Reduction Policy Papers (Canada, EU, 1990s–2000s) → safe injection framing.
Medical Assistance in Dying (Canada: Bill C-14, 2016 → expanded 2021, 2023) → euthanasia normalized.
WHO reports on mental health/psychopharmaceuticals — SSRIs/Oxycodone prescription rates.
5. Narrative Management
World Bank & UN Women development docs — massive funding for female empowerment in Global South tied to fertility suppression goals.
IPCC & UNFCCC outputs post-2000s — “climate change” replaces population as unfalsifiable anchor.
Thank you so much for the middle article picture break with the cutie pole vaulter xD
I will assume this is about breeding attractive witch women. My personal head canon. That is all
Population of Earth before World War II: 1.75 Billion
Population of Earth now: 8 Billion
Population of USA before World War II: 92 million
Population of USA now: 345 million.
Population of Japan before WWII: 50 Million
Population of Japan now: 124 million
The point is that people managed to have two World Wars with less than half of the people we have now. If 2 out of 3 people vanished into thin air in the USA they would still have more people than before the World Wars.
"Oh noooo all the heckin' old people in Japan are gonna die and they'll run out of people!"
Half of Japan could drop dead and they'd still have enough people to power World War II.
I came for the breedable woman, and stayed for the white supremacy.
Apart from Africa and the Middle East, numbers are already balancing out.Also, hardly any of the groups in problematic numbers can sustaine their level of societal complexity. Take away all the White support on every level and the problem disappears within a generation.
CRISPR is evil faggotry in the tradition of transhumanist globalists. WEF Klaus Schwaband his gay-married Asian husband butt-fuck to this transhumanist porn.
Granted, you are young, dumb, and full of rage, but give it time for greater ideas to take hold. For me, a permanent state of low-grade hand-to-hand warfare is an excellent way to perfect man in the image of Apollo. A future America that reintroduces clans, tribes, and nations would be glorious. I want to see tribes owning and distributong land and only blood purchases land expansion.
Why are we here? To perfect our soul in the crucible of struggle and to reincarnate into our tribe until we get it right. With this simple maxim, the patrons and wealthy of your tribe are likely to use their wealth to create a better city-state for them to reincarnate to. The children of your society are loved and provided for better than any other known society - as these children are us and our grandparents.