Zero Tolerance
Stop pretending enemies are friends.
No, we won't be judged by our success – they will only ask how loud was our “Yes,” how brightly the flame of will burned in us.”
-Ernst Junger, “Blood”
Political discourse rarely changes. Ideologies might bend, extremes become norms, etc., but fundamentally it all stays the same. There's the moderates in the middle squabbling over nothing while the so-called extremists brainstorm how to take over. There's also a faction that marks the border between extremist & moderate. Nowadays, these borders are called the Woke Left & Dissident Right.
As I said, these things don't change beyond the superficial elements. I don't remember what the Woke Left was called back in the day, except maybe SJWs. But I do remember what the Dissident Right was called, back then it was the AltRight, headed by people like Richard Spencer. These people gave birth to the White Nationalism 2.0 nonsense that we're still dealing with in the form of Patriot Front.
People often forget how big the AltRight was back then, in the mid 2010’s. It was constantly in the news, Hillary spent her whole campaign bitching about it. Another thing people forget is how useless the AltRight was & how fast it collapsed in the aftermath of Charlottesville. The Unite the Right rally, and the death of whoever that fat bitch was, finished the AltRight. They also had no where to fall back on because Trump also pulled the rug out from under his most enthusiastic base of support.
Thankfully, I was already on IronMarch at the time. Alexander Slavros, pseudonym of IM’s founder, published a fairly lengthy piece named Zero Tolerance in 2015. This work was aimed specifically at the AltRight & addressed its major arguments. In that work, he split the AltRight into 3 core groups:
Entryist Tactic - Essentially the people who think they can cover up & dilute their ideology enough to gain support until they take power.
Hipster Conservatism - This one needs little explanation. The retards who want to look special & forward thinking but in reality just push normal Conservative views ever so slightly further.
Racist Liberals - These people form the bulk of the AltRight. Just otherwise normal moderates but racist & antisemitic, no actual ideology.
Sound familiar? Yeah, all of that applies to what's now being called the “Dissident Right.” Nothing changed beyond superficial names and opinions. However, the DisRight isn't just a simple evolution of the AltRight. The AltRight died in Charlottesville, it's main figureheads are beyond irrelevant now (thank the gods). The DisRight is made up of new people, the modern radicals that drifted away from moderate politics.
Unfortunately, this means that they learned nothing from the failures of the AltRight. They also fail to grasp simple concepts that we evolved past a decade ago. Enter John Arktos.
For whatever reason, a good number of iSubstack ended up following John Arktos. I followed him because he was followed by a number of my muties from iFunny. Nothing I read from him particularly profound & all relatively basic RW droning, but this comment was the first thing I’ve read from him that made me question his mental capacity. It's honestly a mental flashbang reading something that I would never that I’d see again after like 2014.
Naturally, Mr. Arktos probably wasn't involved with dissident politics until recently. He missed a few steps that the rest of us encountered a decade ago & new take for granted. Making up a new phrase (“Whiteshift Nationalist”) is the cringiest thing in the world.
What Arktos is doing here is the same thing every half assed radical does, he's defining our ideology based off the enemy's worldview. Being White is 100% biological. Its not based off the color of your skin, it's based off your ancestry & DNA. This has been well understood for arguably thousands of years. “Anti-Racism” only became prominent in the last century or so, never before in history.
Arktos is choosing to ignore basic science & turn our race into some abstract set of values. It's one thing to muddle our blood by miscegenating with some chink, it's another to try & play it off as White. I should also point out that he didn't address any of the facts Sectionalism laid out regarding the physical truth of race, which he is quite good at.
Arktos also falls into this dumb trap that the DisRight as a whole seems to, that being obsession with IQ. I’m not sure where this exactly comes from, but it's idiotic. No aristocracy (as these types always try to pass themselves off as) has ever been based on intelligence. They were always based on character, and spirituality. Above all, what made one ‘noble’ was most often determined by Courage. Because things like Courage are rare & only present in a select few. Things like these exist regardless of whether your IQ is 80 or 180. IQ is nothing more than a tool, just like height or athleticism. It doesn't reflect on your character.
Regardless, why does Arktos seem so intent on changing the definition of White & justifying the defiling of our race? There's 2 reasons that these people almost always have, even if they hide it. Either they're not White or the lover isn't White. Considering that Arktos claims to be British, if he isn't White then he is a racial invader. If his lover isn't White then he's supporting a racial invader. Either way, he is an enemy trying to fit in with us because he has some milquetoast opinions about trannies or migration policies that may be slightly controversial.
The reason I write this article is because John Arktos, despite being ratio’d hard, is emblematic of the “mass movement” AltRight, DisRight, etc. They are still Liberals even if they might have one or two points of agreement with us. Nick Fuentes, above any xtian nationalism or anti-LGBT rhetoric is still nothing more than a spic (& probably a faggot too.) He will preferably be on the first plane to land in El Salvador when mass deportations kick off.
Let's get 1 thing straight, the issue of our age isn't some petty ideology or anything. It's a fundamental issue with the modern worldview as a whole. The bulk of the DisRight are just Lemmings like everyone else. A few will clean themselves up & become the ‘diamonds in the rough.’
In the words of Hammer of Blood Tribe, “the masses aren't to be convinced, they're sacks of potatoes to be lugged around.” It's already well known that the aristocracy or elite of a society determines its worldview, morality, etc. That's a good thing, it's the reason Hitler was able to fix the ills of Weimar Germany in just a few short years. That is our relation to the Dissident Right. They’ll be the first of the lemmings to turn to our cause, but lemmings nonetheless. No big tent movement will ever change that fact. The whole point of Accelerationism is disrupt the System so that the masses are forced to look elsewhere for leaders.
The Soviets called US lefties “useful idiots” for how easily influenced they were. The DisRight are our own useful idiots.
Finally, I’ll touch on deradicalization agents. These are people or events that give *false* hope to us in order to deradicalize us & return faith in the System. Like “FarRight” politicians who run off of things like mass deportation but never follow through (Trump). It also includes people “like us” who steer towards moderation (Richard Spencer). All of these are just excuses to not hold true to your beliefs. No one is coming, it's up to us. The DisRight always falls into a false whitepill everytime some vaguely FarRight party has gains (AfD, RN, GOP), this isn't winning. We win when we have power - without compromise.
And before anyone accuses me of “punching right,” there's nothing right of me but the wall. The extremists, the fanatics, will inherit the Earth. No revolution has ever been carried out by the lukewarm masses.
Based. Hexenkartothek for King.
Oh my, if you think the Dissident Right is troublesome, you'll certainly have a ball like I recently had with Walt Bismarck's latest article "White Nationalism is Anti-White", which I'll just link here via my article rejoinder to it: (https://thenorme.substack.com/p/refuting-white-globalism)
As a man from before the Alt Right days, I can help explain the focus on IQ. Of all the markers that are high in societally-relevant predictive capability while also being quantifiable and easy to communicate, IQ reigns supreme. While I do agree that the personalities and other sub-rational qualities of a people are far more important in determining the real nature and goodness of a society - a largely extinct term that was once called National Character - these qualities are qualitative and largely intangible.
Being qualitative renders most of the "betterness" qualities a matter of subjective opinion. What is better, the horizon-seeking adventurism of Whites, or the honor-bound pro-sociality of the Japanese? Can you even compare the two? Whereas an average IQ of 100 is simply higher than an average IQ of 80, and the societies such averages make up tend to show the general results. That instant comparability makes it an incredibly useful metric, even as it isn't of paramount importance.
More difficult still is National Character's intangible qualities. Ask your average Nationalist, "What makes White people special?" and even some of the best speakers among us will struggle to rake together what makes our people unique. It virtually takes a poet to weave the right words together to give form to those strongly-felt yet hardly-articulable notions that belie things like our love of kith and kin or other fundamentals of Nationalistic fervor. Whereas IQ again is very obvious and right in people's faces. Smart is good, dumb is bad. We extend that thinking to virtually every field of high and low debate, and therefore IQ is highly attractive in arguing the point since we are an intelligence-valuing people.
IQ is largely irrelevant to why one would love their people to a Nationalist. No White Nationalist would for a moment think of replacing his people with the Japanese, regardless of their higher IQ. But it is an incredibly useful tool that works with one of our most fundamental values as people.
As far as advancing Nationalistic ideas further though, the rational argument is easily won and has been won for many decades now. The real breakthroughs have been through the emotional and the spiritual arguments, which are much more difficult challenges for many of the types we have in these circles. It is the artist and the poet who will drive the great weight of Truth home, and they are through memes and jokes and rhetoric.